Document Type : Scientific- Research Article

Authors

1 PhD candidate in Arabic language and Literature, Kashan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran.

Abstract

   New educational approaches focus on the attention on teaching and application of appropriate methods as well as improving the quality of educational tools such as textbooks. In this regard, the education experts recommend the necessity of validation and the effective factors on educational activities based on valid and scientific theories. The purpose of the present study, "analyzing the comprehension exercises in Arabic textbooks of junior high school in Iran's school using Barrett’s classification (1976)", is based on analytic-descriptive method. In the present research the researchers apply reviewing, including different levels of this theory i.e. literal comprehension, reorganization, inferential comprehension, evaluation and appreciation (understanding) and then classify the questions of exercises according to frequency and percentage. The  Kruskal-Wallis Test has been used to compare the Arabic textbooks to see whether there is a significant difference in the field of comprehension questions among  them or not. Also the mono variable Test has been used to find out if there is a significant difference between the number of comprehension questions with its different levels (according to Barrett’s classification) in Arabic text books of junior high school. In this research, the statistical population and sample coincide and include 126 exercises which come after the texts in the Arabic textbooks in curriculum year (1398-99/ 2019-2020). The results of this analysis illustrate that the authors of these books mostly concentrate on the lowest level of comprehension questions namely literal comprehension. This negligence causes the students’ weakness in critic and analytic thinking skill and these exercises do not help the students’ progress and promotion.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1.    Al-Alwan, Ahmed Falah and Shadia Ahmed Al-Tal. (2010). The effect of the purpose of reading on reading comprehension. Damascus University Journal, Volume 26, No. 3, pp. 404-367.
2.    Barrett, T. C. (1976). "Taxonomy of reading comprehension. In teaching reading in the middle grades". Eds. R. Smith and T. C. Barrett. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.    Fazel Abbas, Maha. (2008). The assessment levels and grades included in the history exam questions. Journal of the Center for Educational Psychological Research, No. 16, pp. 325-288.
4.    Hakhrab, Souad and Abdul Majeed Essani. (2017). Language exercises in the Algerian school, an applied study for the fifth grade of primary school.  Al – dakerah Journal, Issue: 9, pp. 256-234.
5.    Heydari, Abdolhossein and Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Kalan. (2019). Analyzing the Post-Reading Questions of Primary School Persian Textbooks in Terms of Barrett’s Taxonomy. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Tome 18), pp. 92-69.
6.    Jurf, Rima. (1989). Classification of comprehension questions in reading books in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Educational Research Center, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, pp. 32-1.
7.    Muayanah, Mukhlisatun. (2014). "Reading comprehension questions developed by English teachers of senior high schools in Surabaya". Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, Vol 7 No.1.
8.    Muhammad Ali (Harahsheh), Ibrahim. (2007). Reading skills and teaching methods between theory and adaption. Dar Al-Khuzami Publishing and Distribution: Oman.
9.    Organization for Educational Research and Planning. (1398). Seventh grade Arabic.  The First high school. Public and theoretical textbooks. Ministry of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
10.    ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ. (2019). Eighth grade Arabic. The First high school. Public and theoretical textbooks. Ministry of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
11.    ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ. (2019) Ninth grade Arabic. The First high school. Public and theoretical textbooks. Ministry of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
12.    Rahma, Nidiatator and Muhammad Afif Amr Allah. (2018). Evaluating the training book "Al Arabiah Baina Yadaik" in light of Bloom's classification of knowledge. Lasania: Journal of Arab Education and Literature, 2 (2), pp. 192-172.
13.    Reeves, Cheryl. (2012). "Developing a Framework for Assessing and Comparing the Cognitive Challenge of Home Language Examinations". Umalusi.
14.    Ramadan, Hani Ismail and Yamina Abdali. (2019). Researches of the First Arab International Conference for Speakers of Other Languages: Present and Future. The first edition, the Turkish Arab Forum for Language Exchange.
15.    Shabani, Hassan. (2014). Educational skills (teaching methods and techniques). Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books (Samt).
16.    Shehata, Hassan and Marwan Al-Samman (2012). The reference on teaching and learning Arabic language. Edition 1, Arab Book Library.
17.    Sunggingwati, Dyah. (2003). "Reading Questions of Junior High School English Textbooks". Bahasa Dan Seni, Tahun 31, Nomor 1.
18.    To'eima, Rushdi Ahmad. (1986). Reference in teaching Arabic to speakers of other languages. Part Two. Mecca: Umm Al-Qura University.
19.    Yes, Muhammad Yasin; and Hassan Mohamed Doka. (2011). Second or foreign language grammar and common exercises (types, titles, and patterns). The Arab Journal of Speakers of Other Languages, No. 11, Institute of Arabic Language at the International University of Africa, Sudan. Pp. 99-115.
20.    Zare, Sajed and Aliasqar Kargar. (2019). An Evaluation of Tenth and Eleventh Grade Iranian High School Arabic Textbooks on the Basis of Bloom’s Taxonom. Journal of Studies in Teaching and Learning Arabic Language, 3 (5), ff 26-11.