Document Type : Scientific- Research Article
Authors
1 PhD student in the Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor in the Department of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
3 Associate Professor in the Department of Arabic Language and Literature, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
Abstract
Critical analysis of the discourse of the companions of the cave in the Holy Qur'an Based on Norman Fairclough's theory Abstract Evaluating different levels of discourse provides the possibility to discover and achieve its hidden meanings and reproduces the way language interacts with meta-linguistic structures. Critical discourse analysis is a new approach in text analysis that, in addition to paying attention to the linguistic context of the text, considers the non-linguistic context of the text to be effective in discovering and explaining the meaning and examines the relationship between language, power, ideology and discourse. Most of the texts such as the literature of the nations, narratives and some types of stories of the Qur'an can be analyzed and interpreted in this framework. It is a monotheistic discourse in which two opposing forces are placed in front of each other and each chooses a specific type of speech to prove the validity of their claim. Paying attention to selected language patterns along with explaining the cultural, social and political situation of that time can unlock many semantic secrets of the language. Therefore, in the light of the importance of this issue and the need to interpret the Qur'anic text from various angles, this research aims to use analytical-descriptive methods based on the approach of critical discourse analysis of Norman Farklough in three levels of description, interpretation and explanation, the hidden layers of the Qur'anic text. to discover and analyze in this story. From the linguistic and meta-linguistic studies of this story, it is found that each linguistic unit follows a specific linguistic structure, which has special features such as highlighting, choosing words, and arranging them due to the specific ideology of the actors of the discourse. . At the upper level of the dialogues in this story, the repetition of the word "Lord" in contrast to "God" was caused by the monotheistic thinking of the companions of the cave in contrast to the polytheism of the king and the people of that time. The conversation between these two currents in addition to explaining the specific type of ideology. Like monotheism, polytheism, resistance, and unity, it was definitely not exclusive to a historical time, but it was also effective in the intellectual and cultural direction of the audience and future relationships, so that after many years of their death, as a sign of respect for the ideology and belief in this group and spread their religious foundations, a dome was built on their graves.
Keywords
Main Subjects
The Sources and References:
- The Holy Quran.
- Ibn Ashour, Muhammad bin Taher, Editing and Enlightenment, BTA.
- Isfahani, Hussein bin Muhammad Ragheb (1412 BC), Vocabulary of the Qur’an, Lebanon - Syria, 1st edition, Dar Al-Ilm - Dar Al-Shamiya.
- Agha Golzadeh, Firdaws (1385 A.D.), Critical discourse analysis, Tehran, Farhangi and Scientific Publications Co.
- Aghagolzadeh, Firdaws and Ghiathian, Maryam (1386 A.D.), Dominant approaches in critical discourse analysis, Zaban and Zabanshanasi Magazine, p. 1.
- Alusi, Sayed Mahmoud (1415 BC), The Spirit of Meanings in the Interpretation of the Great Qur’an, Beirut, Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiya.
- Balaghi, Sadr al-Din (1329 AM), Quran stories, Tehran, Amir Kabir.
- Bloor, Merrill, An introduction to the process of critical discourse analysis; Rahimi, Ali and Shah Yala, Amir Hossain, Javadana, 1390.
- Tajik, Mohammad Reza (1379 Sh), Discourse and discourse analysis, Farhang Ghaftmani.
- George Yol, Look at the language, Translator: Nasrin Heidari, Tehran, 1384.
- Hamwi Baghdadi, Yaqut (626 BC), Lexicon of countries, Tehran, Sazman Farhangi inheritance.
- Khatib Qazwini, Muhammad bin Abd al-Rahman (732 BC), clarification in the science of rhetoric, Scientific Books House.
- Raji, Asmar, The Detailed Dictionary of Morphology, Beirut, Dar Al-Kutub Al-Alamiyyah, BTA.
- Razi, Fakhr al-Din Muhammad ibn Omar (1420 BC), Keys to the Unseen, Beirut, Dar Revival of Arab Heritage.
- Zamakhshari, Mahmoud (1407 B.C.), The Discovery of the Facts of the Mysteries of Downloading, Beirut, Dar Al-Kutub Al-Alamiyyah.
- Samarrai, Fadel Salih (1420 AH), The Meanings of Syntax, Dar Al-Fikr.
- Suyuti, Abd al-Rahman bin Abi Bakr (911 BC), the masterpiece of the writer in the grammar of Mughni al-Adib, Jordan, the world of modern books.
- Safavi, Korosh (2007), an introduction to semantics, third edition, Tehran, Islamic Culture and Art Research Institute.
- Tabatabaei, Seyyed Muhammad Hussain (1417 BC), The Balance in Interpreting the Qur’an, Qom, Islamic Publications Book, Qom Seminary Teachers University.
- Ateeq, Abdel Aziz, The Science of Meanings, Cap: 1, Lebanon, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya - Beirut.
- Adanlou, Hamid (1380 A.D.), Discourse and society, Tehran, published.
- Fairclough, Norman (1379), critical discourse analysis; Shaiste Piran (and others), Arshar Islamic Culture Ministry, Media Studies and Research Center.
- Qajari, Hossein Ali (1392 A.D.), The use of discourse analysis in social research, Tehran.
- Qureshi, Syed Ali Akbar (1412 BC), Quran Dictionary, 7 volumes, vol. 6, Tehran - Iran, Islamic Book House.
- Madani, Ali Khan bin Ahmad (1120 BC), Al-Hadaeq Al-Nadaiyah in explaining the benefits of Al-Samadiyah, Qom, Dhu Al-Qurabi.
- Mousavi Hamedani, Syed Muhammad Baqer (1400 BC), translation of the interpretation of the balance, Qom, Islamic publications book, University of Teachers, Qom Seminary.
- Mousavi, Seyyed Muhammad Baqer and Ghaffari, Ali Akbar (1371 AM), Stories of the Qur’an, Truthful.
- Yarmohammadi, Lotfollah (1393 A.D.), An introduction to discourse studies, Tehran, Hermes.
- Nazari, Ali Ashraf (1385), "Crisis of Legitimacy: A Reflection on the Political Thoughts of Jürgen Habermas". Farhang Letter, No. 58, July 2015.
)